German
universities typically do not run dormitories, food services, career services,
counseling services, financial aid offices, intramural sports (to say nothing
of extramural sports), and the like. Universities do teaching and research.
Student
services exist in Germany, of course, but they are provided by separate
organizations—the local Studentenwerke—not
directly by the universities. There is a Studentenwerk
for each city that has universities, and its services—housing, dining, distribution
of financial aid, counseling on various matters, help with finding jobs, child
care for students with children, assistance for students with disabilities—are
available to students at all the local post-secondary institutions.* (There are
eighteen of these in Berlin, including research universities, fine arts and
music conservatories, and technical/community-college-type institutions.)
Separating
the student services organization from the academic (teaching and research) organization
not only lets each organization focus on what it does best. It also prevents
student services from raiding the academic budget—which can be a temptation in the US, especially for lower-tier schools competing for students. Allegedly
some US universities have recently considered addressing their budget crises by
eliminating economics, English, history, physics, political science, and/or
computer science departments while keeping indoor rock climbing walls,
extramural sports, and the like. (For
details see an article in Slate, 26 November 2013: http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2013/11/minnesota_state_moorhead_could_cut_18_academic_programs_why_do_colleges.html)
Who knows
how much of a university’s total budget should
go to student services and how much to pure teaching and research? And how much
of the university administration’s time should be spent making this decision?
It does simplify life for the German universities not to have to answer these
questions.
Prying the academic and student-services functions apart probably does save money. Two strong forces stick them together in the US, however. First, the US university model
is half German (the research university) and half English (the residential
liberal arts college), and for the English half of the tradition, the dorms and
so on are part of the community-building which is part of the mission.
Second,
American universities are understood to be of highly varying quality, and
within a given quality band they compete with each other, sometimes in student
services as well as in academics. Shared services seem incompatible with
competition and quality variation. Can you imagine Harvard and MIT and Roxbury Community College all sharing services?
The German universities, in contrast, don’t compete with each other—especially
not for students—to anything like the
same extent.
And in
spite of the efforts made in recent years to identify a handful of “excellent”
universities in Germany, there is less sense of quality variation here. Even to
the extent that there are well-understood distinctions—for example between the
community-college-type institutions, relatively weak research universities, and
relatively strong research universities—the German view is: why should this
make a difference to what the students eat for lunch?
*The Studentenwerke are
funded by a mix of income-producing activities (housing and food services),
student fees (about 50 euros a semester, last time I looked), and government
subsidies (part of government support of higher education). Each Studentenwerk has professional
management, supervised by a board that includes (variously, depending on the
state) representatives of the student associations, the universities, the state
government, and/or the staff of the Studentenwerk.
No comments:
Post a Comment